|
Ontology matching
is a key interoperability enabler for the Semantic Web,
since it takes the ontologies as input and
determines as output an alignment, that is,
a set of correspondences between the semantically related entities of those ontologies.
These correspondences can be used for various tasks,
such as ontology merging, query answering, data
translation, or for navigation on the Semantic Web.
Thus, matching ontologies enables the knowledge and data
expressed in the matched ontologies to interoperate.
The workshop has two goals:
To bring together academic and industry leaders to assess how academic
advances are addressing real-world requirements.
The workshop will strive to improve academic awareness of industrial needs,
and therefore direct research towards those needs.
Simultaneously, the workshop will serve to inform industry representatives
about existing research efforts that may meet their business needs.
Moreover, it is central to the aims of the workshop to evaluate how technologies
for ontology matching are going to evolve, which research topics are in the academic
agenda and how these can fit emerging business issues.
To conduct an extensive, rigorous and
transparent evaluation of ontology matching approaches through the
OAEI
(Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative)
2008 campaign.
The particular focus of this year's OAEI campaign is on real-world matching
tasks from specific domains, such as cultural heritage and medicine.
Therefore, the ontology matching evaluation initiative itself will provide a
solid ground for discussion of how well the current approaches are meeting business needs.
|
|
|
|
|
Audience:
The workshop encourages participation from both academia and industry
with its emphasis on theoretical and practical aspects of ontology matching.
On the one side, we expect representatives from industry to present business
cases and their requirements for ontology matching.
On the other side, we expect academic participants to present their approaches
vis-a-vis those industrial requirements.
Topics of interest include but are not limited to:
- Requirements to ontology matching from specific domains (e.g., civil protection, bioinformatics);
- Application of ontology matching techniques in real-world scenarios (e.g., emergency response);
- Social and collaborative ontology matching;
- Interactive ontology matching;
- Alignment management;
- Background knowledge in ontology matching;
- Reasoning for ontology matching;
- Uncertainty in ontology matching;
- Formal foundations and frameworks for ontology matching;
- Performance of ontology-matching techniques;
- Ontology matching evaluation methodology;
- Ontology matching for information integration;
- Ontology matching for query answering;
- Ontology matching for dynamic environments (e.g., peer-to-peer, agents, web-services);
- Systems and infrastructures.
|
|
|
|
|
Contributions to the workshop can be made in terms of technical papers addressing
different issues of ontology matching as well as participating in the OAEI 2008 campaign.
Technical papers should be not longer than 12 pages using the
LNCS Style.
These should be prepared in PDF format
and should be submitted
(no later than July 25, 2008)
through the workshop submission site at:
http://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=om2008
Contributors to the
OAEI 2008 campaign
have to follow the campaign conditions and schedule at
http://oaei.ontologymatching.org/2008/.
Important Dates:
July 25, 2008: CLOSED [26 papers received for the technical track]
Deadline for the submission of papers.
September 8, 2008: [Review results notifications have been sent out]
Deadline for the notification of acceptance/rejection.
September 18, 2008: CLOSED
Early
ISWC'08
registration deadline.
September 25, 2008: CLOSED
Workshop camera ready copy submission.
- October 26, 2008:
OM-2008,
Congress Center,
Karlsruhe, Germany.
Contributions will be refereed by the
Program Committee.
Accepted papers will be published in the workshop proceedings as a volume of
CEUR-WS.
|
|
|
|
|
Technical Papers:
Christian Meilicke and Heiner Stuckenschmidt
Resolution of conicts among ontology mappings: a fuzzy approach
Alfio Ferrara, Davide Lorusso, Giorgos Stamou, Giorgos Stoilos, Vassilis Tzouvaras, and Tassos Venetis
On fixing semantic alignment evaluation measures
Jérôme David and Jérôme Euzenat
Towards a benchmark for instance matching
Alfio Ferrara, Davide Lorusso, Stefano Montanelli, and Gaia Varese
Using quantitative aspects of alignment generation for argumentation on mappings
Antoine Isaac, Cassia Trojahn, Shenghui Wang, and Paulo Quaresma
A community based approach for managing ontology alignments
Gianluca Correndo, Harith Alani, and Paul Smart
OAEI Papers:
-
Results of the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2008
Caterina Caracciolo, Jérôme Euzenat, Laura Hollink, Ryutaro Ichise, Antoine Isaac,
Véronique Malaisé, Christian Meilicke, Juan Pane, Pavel Shvaiko,
Heiner Stuckenschmidt, Ondřej Šváb-Zamazal, and Vojtěch Svátek
-
Alignment results of Anchor-Flood algorithm for OAEI-2008
Md. Hanif Seddiqui and Masaki Aono
-
AROMA results for OAEI 2008
Jérôme David
-
ASMOV: results for OAEI 2008
Yves R. Jean-Mary and Mansur R. Kabuka
-
Ontology matching with CIDER: evaluation report for the OAEI 2008
Jorge Gracia and Eduardo Mena
-
DSSim results for OAEI 2008
Miklos Nagy, Maria Vargas-Vera, Piotr Stolarski, and Enrico Motta
-
Results of GeRoMeSuite for OAEI 2008
Christoph Quix, Sandra Geisler, David Kensche, and Xiang Li
-
Lily: ontology alignment results for OAEI 2008
Peng Wang and Baowen Xu
-
MapPSO results for OAEI 2008
Jürgen Bock and Jan Hettenhausen
-
RiMOM results for OAEI 2008
Xiao Zhang, Qian Zhong, Juanzi Li, and Jie Tang
-
SAMBO and SAMBOdtf results for the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2008
Patrick Lambrix, He Tan, and Qiang Liu
-
Spider: bringing non-equivalence mappings to OAEI
Marta Sabou and Jorge Gracia
-
TaxoMap in the OAEI 2008 alignment contest
Fayçal Hamdi, Haïfa Zargayouna, Brigitte Safar, and Chantal Reynaud
Posters:
-
On applying matching tools to large-scale ontologies
Heiko Paulheim
-
Literature-based alignment of ontologies
Patrick Lambrix, He Tan, and Wei Xu
-
Ontology mapping via structural and instance-based similarity measures
Konstantin Todorov and Peter Geibel
-
Testing the impact of pattern-based ontology refactoring on ontology matching results
Ondřej Šváb-Zamazal, Vojtěch Svátek, Christian Meilicke, and Heiner Stuckenschmidt
-
Relevance-based evaluation of alignment approaches: the OAEI 2007 food task revisited
Willem Robert van Hage, Hap Kolb, and Guus Schreiber
-
Matching ontologies for emergency evacuation plans
Luca Mion, Ivan Pilati, David Macii, and Fabio Andreatta
-
Ontological mappings of product catalogues
Domenico Beneventano and Daniele Montanari
-
Towards dialogue-based interactive semantic mediation in the medical domain
Daniel Sonntag
-
Towards ontology interoperability through conceptual groundings
Stefan Dietze and John Domingue
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule:
--PDF version--
|
|
8:00-8:20 |
Poster setup
|
8:20-8:30 |
Welcome and workshop overview
Organizers |
8:30-10:30 |
Paper presentation session: OAEI-2008 campaign |
8:30-9:00 |
Introduction to the Ontology Alignment Evaluation Initiative 2008
Caterina Caracciolo, Jérôme Euzenat, Laura Hollink,
Ryutaro Ichise, Antoine Isaac, Véronique Malaisé,
Christian Meilicke, Juan Pane, Pavel Shvaiko,
Heiner Stuckenschmidt, Ondřej Šváb-Zamazal, and Vojtěch Svátek
|
9:00-9:25 |
OAEI-2008: the anatomy test case
Christian Meilicke and Heiner Stuckenschmidt |
9:25-9:50 |
OAEI-2008: the very large crosslingual resources test case
Laura Hollink and Véronique Malaisé |
9:50-10:10 |
DSSim results for OAEI 2008
Miklos Nagy, Maria Vargas-Vera, Piotr Stolarski, and Enrico Motta |
10:10-10:30 |
ASMOV results for OAEI 2008
Yves R. Jean-Mary and Mansur R. Kabuka |
10:30-11:30 |
Coffee break / Poster session
|
|
Consensus building workshop
|
11:30-12:30 |
This session aims at discussing some interesting correspondences among a board of experts.
Such correspondences are determined as a result of the manual evaluation
of the matching results and of the preparation of the reference alignment.
The main goals of this discussion are:
tracking the process of argumentation leading to consensus and increasing
the precision of the reference alignment.
The correctness of correspondences will be considered not only from the general perspective
but also with regard to several application scenarios.
|
12:30-14:10 |
Lunch |
|
14:10-15:30 |
Paper presentation session: Alignment evaluation |
14:10-14:30 |
Incoherence as a basis for measuring the quality of ontology mappings
Christian Meilicke and Heiner Stuckenschmidt |
14:30-14:50 |
Resolution of conflicts among ontology mappings: a fuzzy approach
Alfio Ferrara, Davide Lorusso, Giorgos Stamou, Giorgos Stoilos, Vassilis Tzouvaras, and Tassos Venetis |
14:50-15:10 |
Towards a benchmark for instance matching
Alfio Ferrara, Davide Lorusso, Stefano Montanelli, and Gaia Varese |
15:10-15:30 |
On fixing semantic alignment evaluation measures
Jérôme David and Jérôme Euzenat |
15:30-16:30 |
Coffee break / Poster session |
16:30-17:10 |
Paper presentation session: Collaborative ontology matching |
16:30-16:50 |
Using quantitative aspects of alignment generation for argumentation on mappings
Antoine Isaac, Cassia Trojahn, Shenghui Wang, and Paulo Quaresma |
16:50-17:10 |
A community based approach for managing ontology alignments
Gianluca Correndo, Harith Alani, and Paul Smart |
17:10-18:00 |
Discussion and wrap-up |
|
- Challenges for ontology matching
- OAEI future actions
- Role of final users in ontology matching
- Issues emerged during the workshop
|
|
|
|
|
Organizing Committee:
TasLab,
Informatica Trentina,
Italy
E-mail: pavel [dot] shvaiko [at] infotn [dot] it
Jérôme Euzenat
INRIA & LIG, France
Fausto Giunchiglia
University of Trento, Italy
Heiner Stuckenschmidt
University of Mannheim, Germany
Program Committee:
- Olivier Bodenreider,
National Library of Medicine, USA
- Paolo Bouquet,
University of Trento, Italy
- Paolo Besana,
University of Edinburgh, UK
- Isabel Cruz,
University of Illinois at Chicago, USA
- Jérôme David,
INRIA & LIG, France
- Wei Hu,
Southeast University, China
- Ryutaro Ichise,
National Institute of Informatics, Japan
- Antoine Isaac,
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Anthony Jameson,
DFKI, Germany
- Yannis Kalfoglou,
Ricoh Europe plc, UK
- Vipul Kashyap,
Clinical Informatics R&D, Partners HealthCare System, USA
- Monika Lanzenberger,
Vienna University of Technology, Austria
- Patrick Lambrix,
Linköpings Universitet, Sweden
- Christian Meilicke,
University of Mannheim, Germany
- Peter Mork,
The MITRE Corporation, USA
- Natasha Noy,
Stanford University, USA
- Luigi Palopoli,
University of Calabria, Italy
- Ivan Pilati,
TasLab, Informatica Trentina, Italy
- Marco Schorlemmer,
IIIA-CSIC, Spain
- Luciano Serafini,
FBK-IRST, Italy
- Umberto Straccia,
ISTI-C.N.R., Italy
- Eleni Stroulia,
University of Alberta, Canada
- York Sure,
SAP, Germany
- Ludger van Elst,
DFKI, Germany
- Yannis Velegrakis,
University of Trento, Italy
- Baoshi Yan,
Bosch Research, USA
- Songmao Zhang,
Chinese Academy of Sciences, China
Acknowledgements:
We appreciate support from the
Trentino as a Lab
project of the
European Network of the Living Labs
at
Informatica Trentina
and
OpenKnowledge
European STREP (FP6-027253).
|
|
|
|